Merkel BACKED Hillary: Clinton Foundation received £4M German taxpayer cash pre-election

Mrs Clinton said on board her plane: “One of my favourites is Angela Merkel because I think she’s been an extraordinary, strong leader during difficult times in Europe, which has obvious implications for the rest of the world and, most particularly, our country.

A TRANSLATOR living in Germany has revealed that Muslim migrants believe the country "should be Islamised", according to a new report.

By Will Kirby - PUBLISHED: 00:33, Thu, Nov 17, 2016 | UPDATED: 08:00, Thu, Nov 17, 2016


After working in migrant centres Germany for several years, the translator claims a number of the Muslim migrants she has spoken to have revealed a hatred for Christians and are determined to destroy the religion.

The 39-year-old translator revealed that despite her Christian beliefs she is often presumed to be Muslim and – as a result – Muslim migrants often confide in her and tell her about their dislike towards Christians. She said: “Christians are oppressed, intimidated and harassed by Muslim refugees. This is normal. Some women told me, ‘We will multiply our numbers. We must have more children than the Christians because it’s the only way we can destroy them here’.”

The translator, who arrived in Germany in 1991 as a refugee from Eritrea, said she began volunteering in asylum centres after wanting to give something back following the "open-minded reception and support" she received on arriving in the country.

Clashes between Christian and Muslim asylum seekers have been on the rise in recent years. A report released last month claimed that 743 Christians have been the victims of attacks in Germany's asylum system since May, with 416 reported to have suffered physical abuse.

Of the 743 victims, 44 said they had been sexually assaulted and more than 300 received death threats. In a shocking revelation, the perpetrators in 205 of the cases were employed as guards at asylum homes - flouting their duty to protect the migrants in their care.

The translator continued: “Pure hatred against non-believers is preached, and children are brought here from an early age here in Germany. It’s very similar in asylum housing, where Muslim boys refuse to play with Christians. When she has tried to encourage Muslim children to play with their Christian counterparts, she said typical responses include: 'I don’t play with Christians. My parents hate them too.'”

Better off OUT: Shock verdict of Remainer who spent 8 years at heart of 'unreformable' EU

BRITAIN is better off outside the European Union because it is a power-hungry political project hellbent on the creation of an EU superstate, a former europhile has said.

From the LEAVE campaign

Meanwhile in the here and now, it has been another week of bad news for Remainers as more and more evidence piles up confirming the wisdom of our vote to Leave in June. The CBI has reported a boom in British exports, and the ONS has confirmed that growth since Brexit has outpaced the pessimistic predictions of Project Fear’s doom merchants. And the head of the World Trade Organisation changed his tune and confirmed that trade wouldn’t be disrupted by British exit from the failing EU.

The good news puts the misguidedness of Theresa May’s pronouncements on the negative consequences of Brexit to the UK economy into sharp relief. The Guardian, which broke the ‘story’ of Mrs May’s attendance at a talk hosted by Pro-EU investment Bank Goldman Sachs in the run-up to the referendum, chose to emphasise the apparent ridiculousness of a Remain campaigner arguing for Britain to stay in the EU rather than her apparent lack of acumen.

Meanwhile, Belgium has annoyed the entirety of the European Union and Canada with their attempts to undermine the CETA deal. The deal currently appears to be back on, but the entire incident has highlighted the absurdity of attempting to arrange trade between so many parties with different economic and commercial interests. Why should the assent of the Walloon province of Belgium be required for Britain to trade more freely with our old friends in Canada? And if things are looking bad for the EU and its ability to secure trade deals, according to Leave.EU Ambassador Jim Mellon, they’re about to get a lot worse when the Euro inevitably collapses.

The trade agreement between Canada and the European Union has exposed the flaws in European trade strategy, with the pact nearly being derailed by the objections of the Walloon province of Belgium; a CBI report showed British manufacturing enjoying a boom driven by foreign exports, confirming previous evidence from PMI data; another survey showed a fall in the number of distressed British firms following our vote to Leave; Nissan opted to build new models in Sunderland after months of us being told that Brexit would hurt the British car industry; and voters were reminded of the direct financial costs of EU membership after the Treasury accidentally published a £700m bill from the failing bloc.

Euro 'house of cards' to collapse, warns ECB prophet

Ambrose Evans-Pritchard in "The Telegraph" - 17 October, 2016


Today's evidence for the prosecution comes from Professor Otmar Issing, the ECB's first chief economist and a towering figure in the construction of the single currency. You might think he should know of what he speaks, but on the hand Eric's rants have ferocious power. I especially like the reference to the EU'S "obfuscation, political mendacity, and endemic denial." I could never accept any kind of leadership by anyone committing these three things, but of course to you REMOANIACS the only thing that matters is money, and even on THAT you are wrong.

According to Professor Otmar:

POLICE FORCE CONSIDERS ALLOWING ITS OFFICERS TO WEAR THE BURKA

From a local blog: "I am a police officer and have just converted to MIALS (Mad, Insane And Lunatic Sect) a religion created after our drunken Sargeant had a vision in the bog. It's all very exciting, but in our faith we are not allowed to wear any clothes except a black balaclava. I wore the correct dress as laid down by our Prophet, but the Inspector said it wasn't allowed, so I have reported him for racism and religious discrimination and the case is now before European Court of Human Lunacy.

I'll keep you posted."

House Prices Exposed!

"There will be a hit to the value of your home by at least 10%, up to 18% [if we Brexit]" - George Osborne, May 2016

"Asking prices increased in August by 0.6% compared to the previous month, with annual growth increasing to 5.6% in August from 5.2% in July" - Nationwide, 31st August 2016

Senior Airman Brian Kolfage

Black Lives Matter Thugs EXECUTED 9-year-old Tyshawn Lee in Chicago. They planned to torture him by cutting off his fingers, ears. But instead put a gun to the back of his head and pulled the trigger.

There were no riots, no protests, no looting, no uprising, no stores burnt down, hell there wasn't even media attention. Apparently to the 'community' of chicago his black life did not matter. It's just another crime swept under the rug because it doesn't fit the false narrative that divides Americans by race.

E) The vast majority of these migrants are young, Muslim males (many of whom have paid smugglers to get to Europe) who hate European culture and seek to replace it with ISLAM. The poor, young, old, weak, infirm and CHRISTIANS have mostly been left to be murdered in one way or another by Assad or ISIS.

Sooner or later the Russian people will get fed up with this, but then Putin will distract them with an invasion of Ukraine and God knows where. As Empress of Europe, YOU, Frau MERKEL are substantially responsible for most of this utter shambles as European economies are failing left, right and centre - even in France - thanks to the absurd euro, which you all KNEW could not work without full fiscal and political integration, for which NOBODY HAS EVER VOTED.

And REMOANIACS wanted us to REMAIN in this lunatic asylum of economic and political incompetence and zealotry?

REVEALED: Desperate EU bosses splurge €1TRILLION on bonds to prop up ailing eurozone

A) The EU zealots knew it could not work.

B) They did not care because ....

C) .... they calculated that its eventual failure would FORCE the fiscal and political superstate union that is their obsession.

D) Part of their plan has worked - the euro has indeed failed. We wait to see whether the peoples of Europe are so stupid as to let part B work, too.

E) British plebs saw through the plan, and told the EU to stuff it. BREXIT was intelligent and moral: a refusal to connive in the economic ruination and forced, unmandated integration of Europe.

REMAINERS ...

- did not CARE about the morality of remaining
- did not care about the lies told over decades about the true aim of the EU  (the obsession with creating a federal European state)
- completely swallowed the establishment's incredible scare-mongering during the referendum campaign, despite the facts presented to them by LEAVE
- did not care about the relentless loss of their country's sovereignty
- did not care about the ruination of Southern Europe
- stuck two fingers up at our fishermen, so grossly betrayed over decades
- seemed mostly concerned about their own pockets and property assets

1) Go to Pakistan, Afghanistan or Iraq illegally. Don't worry about their immigration quotas, visas, international law, or any of that nonsense.

2) Once there, demand that the local government provides free medical care for you and your entire family.

3) Demand bi-lingual nurses and doctors.

Cameron was lauded by his outgoing team, but his greatest achievement was using his glib tongue to fool people into believing he had any substance.

He ran an appalling and dishonest REMAIN campaign; he lied about reducing immigration ("We will reduce immigration, no ifs or buts."); his attitude toward ISLAM is moronic and dangerous; he has vastly increased debt, made no real reform of the bloated benefits system; run down the armed forces; done nothing about the disastrous housing and NHS situation; done nothing to halt illegal immigration; given billions away to corrupt governments in foreign aid in a sort of self-righteous ego trip even as poverty has increased in Britain, and law and order are a joke.

GOOD RIDDANCE.

Boris is frequently sneered by the usual suspects but always confounds his idiot detractors. He was elected TWICE as London Mayor, so he must have been doing something right. He made a considerable difference to the Leave campaign. Would we have won without him? I am not so sure.

"Hold on to your seat belts; it's going to be a bumpy ride."

What we have is a very silly woman whose only justification for existence is Scottish independence - which of course is why she wants Scotland to leave the UK, where the English subsidize her and give her lots of autonomy, but remain in the EU as a tiny region amd net contributor to a federal state and with no autonomy.

In other words, she is potty. GIVE THE SCOTS ANOTHER VOTE AND IF THEY WANT THE ABOVE, GOOD LUCK TO THEM. You won't find many English complaining about being free of the Scottish ball and chain - or the whiney Sturgeon.

Sturgeon is mad.

A) In the UK Scotland gets huge subsidies from England and has lots of autonomy.

B) Outside the UK and not in the EU who knows what Scotland gets, but go for it.

C) Out of the UK but in the EU Scotland has to PAY for EU membership and has almost NO autonomy.

GIVE THE SILLY MOO ANOTHER REFERENDUM AND SETTLE THIS ONCE AND FOR ALL. WE ENGLISH ARE GETTING FED UP WITH THE WHINGEING SCOTTISH BALL AND CHAIN

• We get 50,000 new jobs in fishing.
• We save 28 MILLION QUID NET PER DAY.
• We light a bonfire of idiotic rules.
• We regain control of laws, borders and immigration.
• We can refuse entry to known foreign criminals, and deport them if we choose.
• There is no more danger of a federal Europe dominated by Germany with French-style control and taxes.
• We make our own trade deals - multiple countries are already queuing up.

Were you hibernating during the four-month campaign?

Deutsche Bank Failing:

A) "We at Deutsche Bank are venal, stupid and incompetent - despite our vast remuneration - and our bank is failing with vast debt.

B) We therefore demand that the ECB print billions of euros more Ponzi money to save our skins."

"YOU KNOW IT MAKES SENSE."

A BLOGGER: If you Brits truly didn't know, you have a SUPERIOR ADVANTAGE right now. Merkel threatening you to accept freedom of movement in exchange for access to the European market is a joke.  Let us explain.  Here in the US, we may have an abundance of German vehicles on the road but 'overall' German products do not sell very well.  Also German vehicles here do not dominate the market. 

The car manufacturing company is a Very Large chunk of a country's economy.  Why do you think your Land Rover, Aston Martin, Bentley, Mini was handed over to Germany? Germany was using you Brits to manufacture their German cars and 'Your Former Brands" then turning around to sell you the cars you just manufactured.  There was a huge Advantage to this approach.  They were saving in manufacturing costs taking advantage of lower wages from uncontrolled immigration into Britain and also taking advantage of the Strong pound from sales after selling you what you manufactured in your country, on top of saving in shipping costs. 

Britain Leaving the EU now puts Germany in a very weak position.  Not only will Germany lose a customer, they'll lose profit and manufacturing strength.  For the past 10-15 years, we Americans noticed an increase of German automobiles.  No doubt this was a result of your financial and manufacturing contribution to their automotive industry.  Germany's production increased and sale prices went down.

You Brits might want to reconsider doing any trade negotiations with Germany.  Your greatest advantage is to buy from industries outside of the EU to further weaken Germany's strength and position in the car market industry.  Further, your Britain can have its own car industry and create loads of jobs in many avenues of employment such as Research and Development and computer and mechanical engineering to name a few.  I do believe you British can achieve great feats in profound technology, invention and ingenuity as you once did.

TORY LEADERSHIP?

• Gove is an idiot who has shot himself in the foot with his treatment of Boris. Lindstrom is the only viable leader.
• MAY IS A REMAINER. Cameron "resigned" because (as he said) it needed someone else to carry out the BREXIT negotiations; how the HELL is SHE going to do that convincingly?
• WHERE IS THE ARMY searching EVERY LORRY arriving in Dover and chucking illegals straight back onto a ferry to France?
• WHERE ARE THE NAVY AND ARMY stopping landing craft dumping migrants all along the coast?
• WHY was a Sudanese who walked through the tunnel given asylum and benefits? WHAT PART OF "WE ARE VASTLY IN DEBT AND HAVE NO OBLIGATION TO ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS FROM SUDAN." DO THESE MORONS NOT GRASP?
• CAN'T refuse entry to known murderers? JUST DO IT. What is the EU going to do, arrest us all?
• She thinks that Shariah Law "brings considerable benefits to Britain."

WHOBA COMMENT: TORY ELECTION NASTINESS?

There is very little NASTIER than the current Labour shenanigans, about which I have refrained from comment as it is their problem and why kick an individual or organisation when it is so utterly down?

I only hope something good will emerge from the mismatched bunch of incompetent misfits and malcontents in the so-called opposition. They should be at least THREE separate parties, but FPTP forces them together as otherwise they would NEVER get into government.

How depressed the few decent Labour MPs must be.

ML, you have NO SENSE of BALANCE or FAIRNESS - NONE. You are totally INCAPABLE of giving ANY credit where it is due, where something does not fit into your ossified mindset.


TORY LEADERSHIP?

Gove is an idiot who has shot himself in the foot with his treatment of Boris. Lindstrom is the only viable leader:

MAY IS A REMAINER. Cameron "resigned" because (as he said) it needed someone else to carry out the BREXIT negotiations; how the HELL is SHE going to do that convincingly?

WHERE IS THE ARMY searching EVERY LORRY arriving in Dover and chucking illegals straight back onto a ferry to France?

WHERE ARE THE NAVY AND ARMY stopping landing craft dumping migrants all along the coast?

WHY was a Sudanese who walked through the tunnel given asylum and benefits? WHAT PART OF "WE ARE VASTLY IN DEBT AND HAVE NO OBLIGATION TO ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS FROM SUDAN." DO THESE MORONS NOT GRASP?

CAN'T refuse entry to known murderers? JUST DO IT. What is the EU going to do, arrest us all?

May thinks that Shariah Law "brings considerable benefits to Britain".


She has been a USELESS Home Secretary.

17.4 MILLION LEAVERS will regard with anger and disbelief a Tory choice of May as leader.

Despite Remain campaigners' ‘Project Fear’ warnings of an economic apocalypse should the UK vote for Brexit, households and the wider economy have been dealt a slew of positive developments in the two weeks since the referendum result.

Countries which have so far signalled they would like to open talks with the UK over a trade deal: the US, China, India, the EFTA nations (Iceland, Norway, Switzerland, Greenland and not forgetting the Faroe Islands), Australia and New Zealand, South Korea, Canada, Mexico, Ghana and … Germany! The latter’s government has been told by its industrialists that it had better strike a free trade deal with the UK after Brexit, or else.

UK Government bond (gilt) yields have fallen to record lows, meaning the cost of servicing the country's debt has fallen.The fall in gilt yields also helped boost the pension fund values of workers in both final salary and defined benefit schemes.

Retirement pots have also benefited from a surging FTSE 100. A typical barometer of investor confidence - Britain's top stock exchange is up again today by around 1.5 per cent. The FTSE 100 is now at its highest level this year. The FTSE 100 has far outperformed stock markets in Europe over the last two weeks, which are suffering from investor nerves triggered by fears over the stability of the bloc without Britain. Germany's DAX, France's CAC and Italy's FTSE MIB have all failed to recover from global sell-offs seen on June 24.

Mortgage war: Lowest EVER 10 year home loan launched

Pensioners' joy as retirement pots jump in value since EU Referendum

Meanwhile, estate agents in Britain have reported the market is functioning as normal, with disruption running at low levels. Analysis from national agent Jackson-Stops & Staff shows the decision to Brexit has not impacted supply and demand in the property market. The firm said 39.9 per cent of its properties for sale were currently under offer - a proportion largely unchanged by the vote - and the number of properties on the market has increased by more than 21,000 since the referendum outcome.

Project Fear starting to look ridiculous as UK house prices rise. Demand in the property market is also set to be sustained by ever-lower mortgage rates, in part thanks to expectations that the Bank of England will cut the base rate from 0.5 per cent to 0.25 cent. The Bank has relaxed funding rules for lenders to encourage them to advance mortgages and loans to homes and businesses.

The Pound? REMAINERS have been wetting themselves with joy at the pound’s fall; nothing like taking a short view of a speculative situation of uncertainty, what currency markets hate most..

However:

- currencies fluctuate all the time - much of this is driven by speculation
- the UK economy is in better shape than anywhere on the continent, including Germany
- a lower pound will help exporters and reduce our current account deficit as we import less

AND

- Italy is effectively bankrupt; its banks on the verge of collapse.
- Greece is a basket-case, sustained by endless loans it can NEVER repay.
- France is in official economic crisis.

GERMANY?
- Deutsche Bank has lost 90% of its market value in the last year and is in severe trouble.
- ... will have to have to pay vast costs for Merkel’s immigrant policy.
- ... is heavily dependent on exports, which are going to be under severe pressure in the coming global recession caused by idiot governments getting into too much debt

CONCLUSIONS:

REMAIN LIED MASSIVELY TO THE PEOPLE FROM START TO FINISH.

THE ESTABLISHMENT IS CERTAINLY TRYING TO FIND WAYS OF REVERSING THE VOTE - ELECTING THE USELESS MAY IS THE FIRST STEP.

Nick Boles, MP, supports MAY for Leader of the Tories.

From The Commentator

Keep your eye on the ball. Every lie, every distortion, every piece of scaremongering from the EU Remain camp is aimed at one thing: to overturn the result of a free and fair referendum of the British people on our membership of the European Union.

These scoundrels will stop at nothing, as we saw during the campaign itself. And if, in order to smash the will of the people, they have to whip up such a frenzy that there is an outbreak of xenophobia and even racism, their attitude is this: so be it.

"WE WANT A SECOND REFERENDUM."

No. What YOU need is a second brain. There are multiple reasons for leaving, EACH ONE sufficient in itself. My preferred is fishing. In 1975, the Tories simply GAVE AWAY 66% of our fishing rights. TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FISHERMEN AND OTHERS IN DEPENDENT BUSINESSES LOST THEIR JOBS ALMOST OVERNIGHT. FISHING PORTS ALL ALONG THE COAST WERE DEVASTATED.  The then govt. was determined to pay the EU blackmail and our fishermen were mere collateral damage to be ignored.

These people have campaigned humbly, patiently, stoically and democratically for FORTY YEARS to right this injustice. NOW THAT RIGHTING MAY BE DONE, but idiots like you whine, moan and whinge, when you mostly DO NOT HAVE A CLUE ABOUT THE FACTS.

GO AND TALK TO SOME REAL, WORKING PEOPLE WHO RISK THEIR LIVES TO FEED YOU, AND THEN CRAWL AWAY UNDER A ROCK WITH BOB GELDORF AND LEAVE US IN PEACE.

YOU LOST - YOU ARE A LOSER - GET OVER IT.

The "LEAVE" CAMPAIGN TEAM:

"First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. And then you win." Nigel Farage's long struggle to restore the United Kingdom as an independent, self-governing democracy is a heroic example of what sheer grit and determination can achieve. His personal story is one of overcoming terrific adversity: horrific accidents, life-threatening illness, tremendous pressure from a legion of trans-national politicians, corporate interests and media moguls with the power (or so they thought) to break a man's reputation overnight.

But he never gave up, even when some on his own side urged him to abandon the fight and fade away. He was one of that now vanishingly rare breed of conviction politicians, giving up a successful career in business to take up a cause which involved significant financial sacrifice – a million miles from the sneering careerists of the governing class, who will betray every principle and step on every friend to climb higher up the greasy pole of politics and win a place in the Cabinet of a Tony Blair or a David Cameron; professional politicians who believe in nothing beyond their own power and status.

Later, as Nigel brought UKIP up from obscurity and into the public eye, his fight required personal sacrifices, too: first, the Establishment mocked and pilloried him as a "swivel-eyed loon"; later, as he began to eat into their votes and persuade more and more people to question them, they panicked and turned nasty, labelling him a bigot and a racist and doing all they could to tear him down. It didn't work. The poisonous smears did not silence him. The gangs of spoiled, ignorant millenials and superannuated Leftists who mobbed him when attending meetings or even when doing normal, everyday activities with his family could not drive him from public life. He travelled more and more widely, made more and more speeches and continued to do what he had always done: to tell the truth. People listened.

After carrying the flag for democracy and self-government almost alone for twenty years, he beat both the Conservatives and Labour in the European elections and made UKIP the third-largest party in British politics, winning millions of votes at the last General Election. Through gritted teeth, the political class all had to start telling the public what they already knew: it wasn't racist to have concerns about immigration, and they had been wrong to impose massive, unalterable changes on working class communities without asking anyone's permission. More than that, they had to admit that the European Union which they had long served, and which had long provided a comfortable retirement home for their kind after the public had grown tired of their lies and broken promises, was flawed. David Cameron even promised a referendum, which he never thought he would have to deliver, counting on the fact that he would most likely fail to win a majority and have any token Referendum Bill blocked by a coalition of opposition parties. He didn't count on the appetite for democracy which Nigel had created, and after twenty years of fighting for it a referendum was secured.

Even then, the political class tried to shut him out. Amazingly, a crony-packed Electoral Commission awarded the status of official 'Leave' campaign to a gaggle of Tory ministers and their hangers-on, who had mostly been EU supporters until February this year! This group did everything it could to marginalise the man who had been the face of Brexit for decades; the leader of the only UK-wide party actually committed to Brexit. Its campaign was lazy and incompetent and would have cost us this referendum – if Nigel hadn't knuckled down and carried on doing what he does best. That meant touring all over the country, taking his message to the people directly. It meant accepting endless TV and radio requests to put the case for democracy and controlled immigration as often and as powerfully as possible, forcing the Establishment to confront the really key issues in the debate. It meant taking on David Cameron in the closest thing to a head-to-head debate which the Prime Minister was willing to accept at any point in the campaign, and coming out on top.

It was a punishing schedule, demanding more from Nigel than was asked of anyone else on either side of the debate, but the end result was a massive, historic triumph for democracy. With the Government pouring money into a Remain campaign backed by every elitist global body, every academic institution and think-tank bought by EU money and every greedy multi-national and crooked mega-bank which could muster an empty threat, the people still decided that they preferred "Farage's Britain" to theirs. Without doubt, Nigel is the greatest politician of his generation, securing far-reaching and fundamental change which most Prime Ministers can only dream of achieving, not just for his own country but for all of Europe. We're incredibly sad to see him go, and hope he will continue to play an active role in our public life in future – but he's certainly earned a rest more than anyone.

Thank you, Nigel, for convincing us to believe in ourselves, to take back our country and to embrace a future of opportunity and independence, rather than the slow decline into irrelevance which was all our beaten political class hoped to manage. We couldn't have done this without you.

BREXIT REFERENDUM: Some basic facts:

1) BREXIT won clearly despite the full weight of the establishment and international plutocracy backed by the BBC. THIS WAS AN INCREDIBLE ACHIEVEMENT.

2) Cameron previously said he would stay on whatever the result, but in fact "resigned", if you can call leaving in 3 months time resigning.

3) This enabled him to delay invoking article 50 and to scheme to get May elected,  a REMAINER who obviously has NO INTENTION of BREXITING.

4) The two principle LEAVE campaigners have been sidelined. All this amounts to yet more betrayal.

Millions of us are absolutely furious, as the betrayal of 1975 is obviously set to continue.

We live in a banana republic:

- FPTP means that MILLIONS ARE NEVER REPRESENTED IN THE HOC.

- There is massive postal voting fraud.

- The Tories massively cheated on their election expenses to keep Farage out of tje HOC, and look like getting away with it.

- The BBC is horrendously biased.

- NO LIE is beyond the establishment, which ran an appalling campaign of scaremongering and lies. (WHERE IS OSLIAR'S "Emergency Crisis Budget"?; The stockmarket is at its HIGHEST since August 2015; MANY major companies have said that BREXIT makes no differece; some of the biggest trading countries in the word are queuing up to make trade deals; the £ is not far off its average for the last year).

- Worst of all, they have MANIPULATED naive young people to believe they have been betrayed by "old white people", when it is clear that the kids DO NOT HAVE A CLUE about the real issues. We are already in a soft civil war. I personally feel that REMAINERS are TRAITORS, who are either in favour of - or being manipulated by - international plutocracy and fascism. Naturally, the establishment ploy is to call for "unity. BUT WE WON THE VOTE - FAILURE TO INVOKE ARTICLE 50 NOW IS WAR ON DEMOCRACY. I am ashamed of my country.

The behaviour of all three major political parties has been despicable, made worse by the stupefying hypocrisy of Cameron. His glib, trite bilge seems to fool many people, but not we LEAVERS.

http://www.eutruth.info/

HUNGARY is set to hold a referendum on the European Union's mandatory migrant quotas.

First, Scotland? Nicola Sturgeon's only rationale for existence is to fight for Scottish independence. This is hilarious, since she wants to leave the UK, where Scots are heavily subsidised by the English and have lots of autonomy, and join the EU where Scots will PAY A LOT and have almost NO autonomy. Her ranting is typical of the brain-dead REMAINERS. She is a bleating empty vessel who should be ignored.

AS FOR THE REST, millions of British university students and indeed other adults who should know better DO NOT HAVE A CLUE about the EU or the real issues, so it is no surprise that foreigners find it confusing. HERE are the PRINCIPAL reasons why we voted to LEAVE the EU.

• EU MEMBERSHIP COST: Membership of the EU costs the British taxpayer TWENTY-EIGHT MILLION GBP NET EVERY SINGLE DAY. Only Germany pays more. I am not sure if Germans KNOW how much they pay, but perhaps if more of them DID know then we would have GERXIT .....
  
  
• FISHING: When we joined the EU in 1975 we GAVE UP 66% of our fishing rights, destroying tens of thousands of jobs in the traditional fishing industry and devastating hundreds of little fishing ports all along the coastline. Today, a SINGLE Dutch trawler can catch 25% of our OWN fish. WORSE, WE PAID OUR MONEY to renew Dutch, Spanish and French fishing fleets with large modern boats to come and take OUR fish .... YOU COULD NOT MAKE IT UP!
  
• IMMIGRATION: All EU citizens can travel to all EU countries. This means VAST immigration into the UK from poor countries such as Romania. Many of these people work usefully (efficient Polish plumbers are legendary) but HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS do not, and live off benefits, which are very generous to immigrants compared to the rest of Europe. Rumanians come to the UK, push down wages for Brits and send enough back home to build super new houses. TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND ROMA GYPSIES have come to the UK and need feeding, housing, schooling and medically treating. I am unclear as to why WE are supposed to do this. THIS IS OF COURSE "SOCIALISM": the impoverishment of the relatively better-off in favour of the poorer. This is all very well and indeed noble, but in this case it is not clear to me why this should involve foreigners in distant countries. OF COURSE, A) those responsible in Brussels are not affected; their vast remuneration continues as ever and forever and B) nobody in the UK ever voted for it - except idiot politicians, and here is one:

2009 - “I have read some of [the Lisbon Treaty] but not all of it.” – Caroline Flint (Minister for Europe 08-09)

Regarding immigration, please note that England is the MOST DENSELY-POPULATED COUNTRY in the entire continent except for Malta and Monaco. If FRANCE were to have the same population-density as England it would have to take in ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY-EIGHT MILLION Migrants.

• SECURITY: EU LAW means we CANNOT REFUSE ENTRY TO THE UK TO KNOWN MURDERERS, THIEVES AND RAPISTS. British citizens have been robbed, raped and murdered by KNOWN foreign criminals.
  
• EU REGULATIONS: There is a CONSTANT tsunami of mostly idiotic rules and reglementation from Brussels, whose bureaucracy is based on that of original EU member France. ALL UK companies have to comply with this nonsense even if they do not do business with the EU. One little anecdote: There was a little garage in a village selling petrol and doing some small repairs. When we joined the EU the owner was FORCED to stop selling petrol in gallons and switch to litres. The cost of converting his pump was so high that he ceased trading, even though his business was NOTHING TO DO WITH THE EU WHATSOEVER.
  
• FOOD COSTS: The EU is basically a customs-union (which is determined to become a federal state). It erects BARRIERS against other countries. FOOD IS THEREFORE MORE EXPENSIVE IN THE EU THAN IT SHOULD BE. The idea is to protect inefficient French farmers, but AFRICAN PRODUCERS are penalised. Inside the EU, we lost our seat on the WTO and cannot make trade deals with other countries.
  
• DEMOCRACY: The EU is undemocratic; the Commission is appointed, not elected. Most are failed politicians and/or cronies and friends of other politicians, failing, failed or not. The UK PROTESTED about the appointment of Juncker, but Merkel FORCED him on us. Juncker was PM of Luxembourg for years and arranged shady tax-avoiding deals with multi-nationals. He also LIED CONSISTENTLY about the euro. (see "Quotes" on my website: http://www.eutruth.info/). We TOLD Merkel he would be a disaster, but NOBODY EVER LISTENS TO US. (The EU is basically a stitch-up between Germany and France.)

Some Juncker quotes:

“We decide on something, leave it lying around and wait and see what happens. If no one kicks up a fuss, because most people don’t understand what has been decided, we continue step by step until there is no turning back," he said of the euro.

In May 2011, he told a meeting of the federalist European Movement that he often ‘had to lie’ and that eurozone monetary policy should be discussed insecret, dark debates.

He also sparked controversy by suggesting that the eurozone economic policy was incompatible with democracy. “We all know what to do; we just don’t know how to get re-elected after we’ve done it," Mr Juncker cynically quipped last year.

Mr Juncker was also closely linked to the EU constitution, before the French referendum on it in 2005 he predicted, correctly, that Europe would ignore any popular rejections. “If it’s a ‘Yes', we will say ‘on we go’, and if it’s a ‘No’ we will say ‘we continue’,” he said.

Following the ‘No’ votes in France and the Netherlands, Mr Juncker claimed that in reality voters had actually supported deeper European integration, triggering accusations that the European elite was in denial over public
hostility to the EU. "If we were to add up all the votes of the people who wanted ‘more Europe’ as a ‘Yes’ , then I think we would have had a ‘Yes’ vote," he said.

• FEDERALISATION: As said above, the EU is DETERMINED to force federalisation onto Europe. THIS HAS BEEN CLEAR FROM THE BEGINNING:

1952 - “Europe’s nations should be led towards a superstate, without their people
understanding what is happening.” - Jean Monnet (President ECSC 52-55)

... and is today enshrined in the Lisbon Treaty with the words agreeing to “ever-closer union", but what angers those of us in Britain with a brain is that NO SINGLE EUROPEAN CITIZEN HAS EVER VOTED FOR THIS. It might suit GERMANY, which as the biggest formerly independent country would dominate a European federal state, but IT DOES NOT SUIT THE BRITISH. The EU is POWER MAD: they are determined to get Turkey into the EU AND the Balkans and eventually Ukraine. As for Ukraine, EU policy towards that country has (justifiably or not) angered Russia, and relations with Putin can now only be described as dangerous.

• EU ARMY: The EU is ALSO making noises about forming an EU army, claiming this is essential for its defence. THIS IS NONSENSE. NATO has always provided for Europe's defence since WWII. It is just ANOTHER example of Brussels thinking itself ALREADY to be a superstate. THIS is why the Lisbon Treaty created the EEAS, a "Diplomatic Service" that cost EIGHT BILLION EUROS to set up and hundreds of millions to run each year. We now have an EU "Foreign Minister" and individual EU countries supposedly are subservient to this. IT IS QUASI-FASCIST NONSENSE: an elite doing what IT wants without a mandate from the people. I remind you, NO SINGLE EUROPEAN CITIZEN HAS EVER VOTED FOR A FEDERAL SUPERSTATE IN EUROPE.
  
  INDEED, when the FRENCH in 2006 voted AGAINST the "European Constitution", the EU simply made a few minor changes and then PASSED IT IN PARLIAMENT with a NEW NAME, cleverly by-passing the people - BECAUSE of course, the elite knows best.
  
  
• THE EURO? This was ALWAYS a POLITICAL project. The EU'S OWN economists told them it could not work long-term. NO CURRENCY UNION HAS EVER WORKED WITHOUT FULL FISCAL and then POLITICAL union. The last one to succeed was the Roman Empire .... The economies of Europe are TOO DIVERSE for a single currency to succeed without MASSIVE TRANSFERS of money from the richer northern states to the South. HAVE THE GERMAN TAXPAYERS AGREED TO THIS? Since the eurolaunch, we have seen successive major financial crises in the Med countries, which are now in their TENTH YEAR of recession with youth unemployment of up to 50%. TEN YEARS! Meanwhile, GERMANY has prospered. THE SITUATION TODAY? GREECE can only survive with endless loans it can NEVER replay, while its people live in austerity and recession (partly their own fault of course); ITALY is effectively bankrupt, its banks on the point of failure; FRANCE is in OFFICIAL "economic crisis" and falling FURTHER AND FURTHER behind Germany - and as it happens ENGLAND. Spain and Portugal stagger along. THE EURO HAS BEEN A DISASTER for everyone except Germany. The UK sensibly did not enter the euro. WE TOLD YOU IT WOULD NOT WORK (AND of course the EU LIED about Greece’s original qualifications to enter the euro in the first place; Goldman-Sachs and the ECB were engaged to fiddle the books ....) BUT as we have seen above, YOU NEVER LISTEN TO US.
  
  By the way, the ECB headquarters in Frankfurt cost ONE THOUSAND, FOUR HUNDRED MILLION EUROS and counting - NOTHING BUT THE BEST FOR BRUSSELS, but HEY, it's only the plebs' money .....
  
  The EU response to the obvious euro failure is to demand a SEPARATE "EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT" for Euro members .... their response to ALL crises is to call for "MORE EUROPE" = more integration. Martin Schulz called for this YESTERDAY, despite the BREXIT result and the huge discontent everywhere in the EU.

CONCLUSION: The EU as it is today has failed. The original noble aim of creating a "Common Market" (actually, it was to create a superstate to make sure Germany never launched another European war, but that was never mentioned in polite society) was hi-jacked by unelected and obsessive federalisation zealots. As long as France and Germany were doing OK, it bumbled along, each year grabbing for itself more and more power.

July 10th, 2007 - EU Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso, rejoicing in the “success” of his Revised
Constitution, hailed the EU as “the creation of an Empire”, adding “We have the dimensions of Empire”.

NOW THE TRAIN HAS HIT THE BUFFERS, and even the Germans are demanding more power be returned to individual countries. From the British point of view, THIS IS TOO LITTLE TOO LATE. WHERE WERE YOU WHEN WE TOLD YOU THAT REFORM WAS NEEDED? You treated us with contempt. Cameron went to Brussels (and Berlin) to "renegotiate", came away with almost nothing and yet told us he had got a good deal - while the EU, Merkel and Hollande congratulated themselves on having given us NOTHING. The average British pleb, however, is somewhat more intelligent than the European political elite seem to think. (Learning from history is not their strong point.)

As Nigel Farage said in the European Parliament, "WHO'S LAUGHING NOW?" Though of course, the establishment will as usual do its best to overthrow the vote. They have always succeeded in the past; will the British people prevail this time against a plutocratic elite?

I hope this makes sense Alex!

PS An article from today's media:

"UK IS NOT ALLOWED TO LEAVE THE EU": EU Commission staffer writes to ALL MPs demanding they vote to overturn historic Brexit result - backed by 52% to 48% - because the decision was 'too complex' for the 'uninformed' electorate.

MESSAGE FROM "LEAVE"

Dear Chris,

WE TOOK BACK CONTROL! Last week you changed the course of history. Vote Leave took on almost every force with power and money and we won. Britain chose to Vote Leave. This victory would not have happened without your amazing help and generosity. Thousands of you donated. Thousands of you volunteered. Thousands of you spoke to friends and family on our behalf to spread the message. THANK YOU! In just ten months we built from scratch an unprecedented national movement that took our campaign to every corner of the country. We got to places that ‘politics as usual’ ignored. People who have been ignored, and have never been involved in politics before, suddenly spoke out and took action. In 2008, the worst financial crisis since 1929 hit the world. The people who paid the bills were mainly those on P.A.Y.E. They are still paying. They are also paying the bills for the EU’s and the euro’s dysfunction.

Meanwhile many with power and money who were responsible for the mistakes and were completely wrong in their predictions dodged their fair share of the bills and got rich out of the EU system. We spoke for those on P.A.Y.E. We did new things. Nobody in the UK has ever successfully built a web-based electoral database. Companies have spent millions and failed. We did it in a few months and succeeded. The combination of this database, our digital communication effort and our ground campaign broke new ground for political campaigns. This database product is worth a lot of money. We will shortly put the code online so that everyone can use it for free in the future (keep an eye on Github if interested). Hopefully it will help other campaigns give the public a powerful voice as we have. We’ve shown political parties how they can change and stop ignoring large parts of the country.

Why is this important? The British political system is broken in many ways and needs big changes - the EU is not our only problem. Our campaign was never controlled by any party though there were great people from all parties who helped us. All the parties have very deep problems. The way they are structured incentivises MPs to focus on themselves and their party - not the public interest. It is important that the Conservative leadership candidates accept that the vote must be respected. Both the leading IN candidate (Theresa May <http://www.tmay.co.uk/>) and the leading OUT candidate (Michael Gove <http://www.gove2016.com/>) have made clear that if they win they will respect the vote and deliver a new UK-EU deal. This could mean, among other things, democratic control of immigration policy. This could marginalise extremists and allow a fair, sensible, and humane new policy. It could mean new trade deals and new jobs. It could mean more money for health, education, and science.

But we cannot be sure it will happen. In particular, while there are many wonderful civil servants there are also many who regard our victory as a disaster. They will try to stop or minimise changes. Not all the candidates in the Conservative leadership campaign have shown an ability to deliver big changes in the face of civil service opposition. Many in Labour are in complete denial about the real state of opinion and the real problems of the EU. Few MPs have the skills needed to manage normal government departments - never mind the EU negotiation and complex problems that implementing the referendum result require. Many MPs are desperate to ignore any lessons from the referendum and go back to politics as usual. The situation is very worrying. Westminster cannot be relied upon.

Taking back control to Britain is just the first step. The next step should be major political changes in Britain so that the broken Westminster and Whitehall system has to focus on the public interest in a way it does not now. If we increase the power of MPs and officials without changing how they behave, we will not solve our problems. We need organisations like Vote Leave to operate permanently to give a voice to those who otherwise won’t be heard. This campaign did not win because of support in Westminster - it won because of support in the country that has forced Westminster to listen. But three MPs in particular worked closely together and helped us win: Michael Gove (Conservative), Boris Johnson (Conservative), and Gisela Stuart (Labour) who was also a wonderful Chair. We want to thank all three of them too. They put their careers and reputations on the line. THANK YOU Boris, Gisela, and Michael. Thank you too to other MPs of all parties who helped, such as Anne-Marie Trevelyan and Graham Stringer. It’s been a privilege to have your support throughout this campaign. Your dedication brought victory. On behalf of the team here at Vote Leave, and on behalf of the public, THANK YOU - and goodbye.

Best wishes The Vote Leave HQ

P.S. If you want to keep in touch with events after we have won, then follow the private blog of our Campaign Director, Dominic Cummings - CLICK HERE <https://dominiccummings.wordpress.com/>. If we ever want to send up a ‘bat signal’ that Westminster is cheating the vote and we need to form a new movement, you will see the bat signal there…

AN OPEN LETTER TO NIGEL FARAGE

Dear Nigel, We, the people of Britain, thank you from the bottom of our hearts for your inspiring leadership and your tireless campaigning over decades, often battling a biased, hostile, unfair media, a powerful EU elite autocracy and a LibLabCon political class who collaborated against what was Best for Britain. We persevered against odds which often appeared overwhelming. And Nigel, on June 23 you changed the course of our continent's history. Without UKIP and you, there would have been no Referendum at all, let alone a victorious one! Those throughout Europe who love freedom and democracy already view the United Kingdom's resolve as a beacon of hope for their own countries. We trust you will now find time to relax and enjoy a fulfilling, unstressed private life, while UKIP, that most democratic of parties, will decide upon a worthy successor using One Member, One Vote. As you acknowledged, the continuing need for there to be a UKIP to ensure that Brexit actually takes place, and furthermore that it is on the best possible terms for our country and does not compromise on fundamental issues, has never been greater. We shall defend your legacy. Nigel, when history is written, your place as a Great Briton is assured.

Again - thank you!

Best, Freddy Vachha UKIP Regional Chairman - London

2-7-2016: An FB BLOGGER: "We're a week on from the result. I have sought out 28 "disillusioned" young voters and asked them the following questions:"

I have concluded that they are upset because they wanted to be
comfortably numb in the knowledge they never have to think for themelves.

Sajid Javid tried to distance himself from Project Fear yesterday as he admitted that many of the Remain campaign's doom-laden forecasts could be 'avoided'. The Business Secretary, a Eurosceptic, was savaged by Tory MPs during the referendum over his decision to side with David Cameron and the Remain camp. He faced particular criticism for being willing to side with the Government's various warnings that the UK would face financial catastrophe if the country voted out. But, in a bruising TV interview yesterday, Mr Javid stepped back from his previous warnings about the potential dangers of a Brexit. He refused three times to say there would be an emergency Budget – which George Osborne had threatened would happen within weeks if the UK voted to leave the EU. And he backtracked on his own prediction that a Brexit would trigger a recession 'within two years', along with a '3.6 per cent contraction in GDP, higher inflation, house prices ten per cent lower, and a loss of over half a million jobs'.

Asked by the BBC's Andrew Marr if he still believed that, he replied: 'Throughout the campaign there were many organisations that made all sorts of forecasts.' When the question was repeated, Mr Javid said: 'What matters now is the reality, how we actually face this momentous decision for our country. 'What I actually am focused on now is speaking to businesses, I've called many of them ever since 7am on Friday to get their input. Millions of people, I've spoken to businesses large and small and their representatives, I've convened a special Round Table next week. I'm listening to those businesses, their anxiety, their concerns, and I'm going to make this work.'

Mr Marr, then repeated the question, saying: 'I'm asking you whether you think we're heading for a recession and the loss of half a million jobs. It's not an insignificant question.' At this point, Mr Javid replied: 'I think if we all work together we can avoid many of those things that were forecast. We can work together, we've got a chance to do that.' However, he denied that – by being part of Project Fear – he had been 'dishonest'. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/…/Project-Fear-s-past-says-Javid…

http://trib.al/AJCSGyN

But politics teacher Kevin Rooney, head of social science at Queens’ School in Bushey, North West London, has said that, in his experience, Leave supporters are more likely to be the victims of intolerance than its perpetrators.

Mr. Rooney defied the trend within education and voted to Leave – but he says his elation at seeing the result on Friday morning quickly turned to dismay that afternoon as, at an education conference attended by hundreds of teachers, he witnessed his fellow teachers write off the democratic will of the people.

Chris Snuggs on Scotland:

TOO MUCH HYSTERIA. TOO MUCH LUNACY .... MANY SCOTS HATE THE ENGLISH, BUT THEY ARE NOT STUPID. Only a REALLY stupid person would quit the UK where they are subsidized and have lots of autonomy to join an undemocratic monster which would TAKE their money AND give them no autonomy. GIVE THE STUPID WOMAN HER REFERENDUM NOW. THE SCOTS WILL VOTE TO STAY IN THE UK AND MAYBE SHE WILL SHUT UP HER ENDLESS WHINING.

FGS!!!!! GIVE ME PATIENCE!

This is NOTHING TO DO with not liking or loving Europe. Europe is NOT THE SAME AS THE EU.

Can't you people grasp ANYTHING? Are you REALLY "students"?

I am British, married to two Continental women (not simultaneously), speak four European languages, live in France, have worked and lived in France and Germany for 16 years, have four multi-national and multi-lingual children. I LOVE EUROPE BUT HATE THE FASCIST EU.

GET A GRIP: THANK GOD YOU LOST THE VOTE AS YOU DO NOT HAVE A CLUE WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT.

Chris Snuggs: Such as not wanting to be ethnically-swamped in their own country? Are you a Brown fan? Have you heard of Mrs "Bigot" Duffy? Do you even underSTAND what has happened in this vote? England is the MOST-DENSELY POPULATED REGION OF THE ENTIRE CONTINENT. We have ALWAYS welcomed immigrants, but ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.

MILLIONS of people in the North, traditional Labour voters, HAVE HAD ENOUGH. Your implication that we are RACIST is just stupid. YOU STILL DON'T GET IT. REMAIN ENDLESSLY tried this in the campaign: IT FAILED.

But immigration is just a SYMPTOM of the EU malaise. There are TWO things especially we DO NOT WANT:

A) We do not want to be a mere region of a European federal state ruled from Brussels (and Berlin), dominated by Germany with French poodle in tow and subject to French-style regulations, state-control and taxation levels.

Is that clear enough for you? IT IS NOT COMPLICATED. Is the above what YOU want?

B) We NO LONGER accept to pay TWENTY-EIGHT MILLION QUID NET EVERY SINGLE DAY in foreign aid to subsidize French farmers, unused Portuguese motorways and non-existent bridges in Greece, not to mention 5 press secretaries for Martin Schulz and God knows how many chauffeured limos for EU officials - and of course the ONE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED MILLION EURO ECB building in Frankfurt, the THREE HUNDRED MILLION EURO EU Presidential palace in Brussels or the EIGHT BILLION EU diplomatic service or indeed the TEN THOUSAND EU employees who earn more than our Prime Minister and pay sod-all tax.

Do YOU accept all that?

We ALSO want back the 66% of our fishing rights we gave away 40 years ago, betraying our brave fishermen.

We ALSO no longer want the endless LIES, not least about the fraudulently-created euro, which has led to the ruination of Southern Europe and a ten-year recession with 50% youth unemployment in Greece, currently getting endless loans which it can NEVER REPAY. Even FRANCE is in OFFICIAL ECONOMIC CRISIS for goodness sake.

BLOGGER: Never, in any political process I have witnessed, has the collective might of the state media sought to tell the majority of the people that they were wrong following a vote. That is until until the 24th of June in the UK. Yes, the British people exercised their democratic right to vote against the European Union, a right which had been denied them by successive Prime Ministers since John Major. But the reporting of this momentous event, which should have been a celebration of democracy, has been nothing but appalling virtue signalling.

Were you a Remain campaigner? Are you sore about the referendum result?

Check out these 10 top self-comforting strategies.

1) Jump out of your pram.

2) Hand back your medals.

3) Use the word "populist" instead of "popular", each time with a vicious snarl on your face.

4) Bathe in a warm glow of self-righteousness knowing that you were on the same side as Geldorf, Izzard, Blair, Brown, Mandelscum, Cameron, Diane Abbott, Corbyn, the Kinnock and Miliband Dynasties, Juncker, Merkel, Hollande, Obama, Lagarde and David Beckham and AGAINST John Mann, Frank Field, Tony Benn, Dennis Skinner, Geoff Dyson and Joe Bamford.

5) Sign a petition demanding an immediate rerefendum repeat expecting a different result (something usually reserved for lunatics, but not uncommon in the EU.)

6) Call every white person who voted LEAVE a "racist", ignoring the fact that Europeans are also white. Treat ethnic minority LEAVE voters as some kind of weird aberration to be ignored.

7) Claim that the (huge) turnout wasn't high enough. 72%? It should have been at least 75%! 80%? It should have been 85%! Make sure to keep moving the goalposts.

8) Get over-excited about the economy, even if the impact has been pretty boring and mundane. Pretend that your 2:2 in English Literature or your 3rd in Sociology make you an expert on currency markets.

9) Attack the very idea of Democracy, because it's only a good thing when it goes the way you want it to. Working-class voters don't know what's good for them, but middle-class liberals definitely do.

10) Share memes bashing Brexit, ignoring the unwelcome and uncomfortable realisation that you are in the minority of public opinion.

11) Boldly claim that Scotland will leave the UK, forgetting that A) they can't afford to B) the EU can't afford to take them C) 1.6m remain votes don't cancel out 2m NO votes.

12) Make fun of Boris Johnson while sweating slightly and really hoping he doesn't become Prime Minister.

13) Continue to call Farage "a racist", ignoring the fact that 52% of the population agree with him.

14) Learn absolutely nothing from the campaign, blaming the result on everyone but yourself. Scaremongering and bullying are clearly the best tactics to use; there's no way they could possibly backfire.

15) Curl up in a ball and cry yourself to sleep while listening to "Ode to Joy"and staring lovingly at a portrait of Blair, Junker, Merkel and Hollande.

http://www.express.co.uk/comment/columnists/frederick-forsyth/683238/Working-class-Northerners-revolted-against-London-luvvies-Brexit

Working-class Northerners have revolted against the London luvvies, says FREDERICK FORSYTH

WHAT we have just seen is actually an insurrection.

UKIP Manchester 8 hrs · Nobody ever says Switzerland is in economic ruin, or are bigoted and xenophobic to reject EU membership. In fact, it has the highest average earnings per capita (I believe) almost anywhere in the world, it has more trade deals than almost anywhere in the world, it has some of the lowest taxes in the world, it exercises direct democracy through referenda on big subjects of social concern, it is considered the diplomatic capital of the world, has the world's biggest scientific research project in the form of the large hadron collider at CERN, is made up of three cantons much like the constituent parts of Great Britain, and the Swiss are largely regarded as hard working, tolerant, rich, successful, polite...

This outpouring of emotion based on some warped idea that by leaving the EU we've become football hooligans that hate foreigners and will destroy our economy is the result of people taken in by lie after lie by the remain campaign and that really wasn't fair of them to ruin your belief in your country like that. It is not true and you have nothing to worry about. You will see over the coming months quite how extensive those lies were. Accession talks with Turkey begin very soon and plans for the EU army are being unveiled next month. We are lucky we now get to control our own destiny and we are not sitting here wondering if the Euro will crash (it will, probably in July when Greece defaults) and whether we have to bail it out, which country will be the next to join and what the migratory flows will be, or what plans Brussels has up its sleeves next that are not only not run past the British people, but made up in secret by people who aren't even elected to govern us and then imposed upon us. All that has happened is we now have full freedom to make all of our own laws. That's it. And we aren't going to bring back the workhouse or start deporting people.

My God! What sort of a country do people think we are? Have some pride you Brits! We are an open, fair, tolerant, hardworking, wonderful nation that has global respect. Many a nation functions perfectly well as a self-governing state without having to be in a supranational political union dominated by the lobbying forces of Moody's, Goldman Sachs, Pfizer et al. This is a real victory for the people. You will see. This is the start of something truly amazing and we are brave, courageous and principled to do this. I am so very, very proud of Britain, and you should be too, once again showing the world that we not only value democracy, but fight for its preservation. Well done us. It's time people stopped scribing hyperbolic messages of woe on social media and bashing their fellow citizen who took the plunge to leave the EU. Those are not British values and if that's the nature of the majority of people who backed Remain, well I am glad the heroes, the freedom fighters and democracy warriors won it. Let's start this new life now and let's be Great Britain.

REMAIN STILL DON'T GET IT.

They lost because:

A) They had no valid arguments.

B) They indulged in vile personal mud-slinging and scaremongering.

C) They were led by someone generally considered to be a smooth-talking liar.

D) They were perceived as self-righteous and unpatrioti

Political Elite "Headless Chicken" Crisis Talks

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/680392/EU-takes-Brexit-seriously-Christine-Lagarde-IMF-boss-talks

Merkel: "Right - the Brits are buggering off - Well done, Juncker: another fine mess you've got us into; couldn't you have humoured them a bit more? Given them a few more fish or something? What the hell are we going to do without their dosh? Do you think we Germans are made of money?"

Juncker: " But ....."

Merkel: "Now let's see. First we cut all our salaries by half - OK?"

Lagarde: "But ......"

Merkel: "THEN you prattling pillocks in the IMF start paying TAX on what's left, of course."

"Lagarde: "But ....."

Merkel: "Then you all relocate to cheaper premises; that makes sense - we can put thousands of migrants into your palace for a start."

Juncker: "But ....."

Merkel: "Then the EU will have to cut the €8,000,000,000 Diplomatic Service, the 300 Press spokesmen for Schulz and we can get rid of Reding and Verhofstedt - actually, not sure if we really need Schulz and his army of secretaries either ..... remind me what he actualls DOES?"

Juncker: "But ...."

Merkel: "Oh DO SHUT UP JUNCKER: this is all your fault in the first place .... why did you have to ADMIT that you are a serial liar? Being one is ONE thing, but ADMITTING IT? GOTT IM HIMMEL!"

Juncker: "Well ...."

Merkel: "And we replace the 9000 chauffeur-driven cars with pushbikes - you could do with losing a few kilos Juncker, you fat slob ...."

Juncker: "But ....."

Merkel: And if you pinch my bum ONCE more in one of your drunken binges I'll have you: cameras or no cameras."

Juncker: "But ...."

Merkel: "Right: that'll do for a start, OH, no more Europarliament pfaffing about up and down to Strasbourg, right?"

Hollande: "But ......"

Merkel: "I thought we had a deal, Flanby. I talk; you listen - as we always do. .... "

Hollande: "I .....

Merkel: "Did you not hear what I just said, Flanby? Well, there's one good thing: at least we don't have to bother with that hypocritical and ludicrous "Hug-a-Brit' rubbish any more. Right - where's our coffee, and time for the photocall."

This has NOTHING TO DO WITH NATIONALISM. It is the EU which has caused strife and dissention in Europe. Many people HATE the EU. Do you call that a success? Europe is the ONLY region in the world not growing. Many European countries are vastly endebted and have severe economic problems, including France, in OFFICIALLY-ADMITTED "economic crisis".

We must REJOIN THE WORLD, reconnnect with the Commonwealth, regain our seat on the WTO, save 30 million euros a day, get back our fishing and tell them where to go with their obligatory lawnmower insurance and their straight bananas.

Regarding the death of Labour MP Jo Cox, is there no level to which the Remain campaign and some of their supporters will not stoop to win the referendum?
Before Ms Cox had even been confirmed dead, the mainstream media, along with people on social media, Twitter, Facebook etc, immediately went into overdrive blaming the Leave Campaign We've even had EU politicians and Hillary Clinton making statements suggesting as much. One commenter on social media wrote of Nigel Farage that "He as blood on his hands".

Will they stop at nothing to score political points to make political gain? Is nothing beyond the pale for them? They conveniently chose to ignore the reports that the assailant, Thomas Wair, had a history of mental illness, or that his neighbours said that he never, ever spoke of politics and wasn't a supporter of any political party as far as they were aware. They also chose to ignore the fact that other eyewitnesses denied that Thomas Wair said anything along the lines "Britain first" during the attack.

Clarke Rothwell, who claimed to be an eyewitness to the attack, told the BBC that the attacker said either "Britain first' or 'Put Britain first', he wasn't quite sure, yet all other eyewitnesses have stated that no such thing was said. How convenient that the BBC happened to come across the ONLY person who supposedly heard Thomas Wair speak those damning words.

"Jo Cox was murdered because of her political beliefs ....... she was hated because she was pro-EU .....blah, blah, blah" cried the shameful political opportunists, whilst rubbing their hands, no doubt, at the thought of how it might damage the Leave campaign, and ignoring the fact that Jo Cox couldn't have been the assailant's intended target because she was in a cafe at the time and only went outside to intervene in an argument/fight that Thomas Wair was having with another man. It appears that she was simply in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Labour MP Maria Eagle was quick to tweet yesterday to spread the word that the attacker had said "Britain first", Yet within a few hours she deleted her tweet. Why was that? If it were the truth why did she delete it?

Yesterday exposed the vile, putrid underbelly of the Remain campaign for all to see. The people involved in the media attacks are ruthless, lying, shameless people who possess no morals whatsoever. On top of that, they are traitors to Britain and the British people. No less traitorous than Ted Heath and his ilk, who took us into the EU, unlawfully, I might add, using blatant lies to fool and betray us. It's understandable why foreign politicians in the EU and the socialist, slave to the international bankers, Hillary Clinton would make statements on the murder of Jo Cox to further the Remain cause. But for British politicians, both past and present, to do so is unforgivable.

If we should lose the referendum, I hope that ever last one of them burns in eternal Hell.

Credibility poll (out of 10)

Cameron and Osborne (rolls off the tongue like Laurel and Hardy) = 0

Lagarde = minus 2,000

Blair, Brown, Mandelscum, Clegg and the Miliband and Kinnock dynasties = minus 10,000

Obama, Hollande and Merkel = minus off the scale

Bob Geldorf and Goldman-Sachs = Excuse me, I have to vomit

Tony Benn, John Mann, Dennis Skinner, Frank Field and Kate Hoey = 10

Geoff Dyson and Joe Bamford = 10

Del Boy, Michael Caine, Joan Collins and Posh Beckham = 7

See more OUTERS here: http://www.eutruth.info/

A mail to my mate Michael ......

The Referendum? Made up your mind yet?

I urge you to reject the variable of personalities. This is not about whether you prefer Kinnock, Corbyn, Blair, Brown, Mandelscum and Diane Abbott to Boris, Farage, Gove or Snuggs, but about the future of our country. Forget that Farage is a cross between Attila the Hun and Robert Mugabe, that Boris is a scheming buffoon and that I am a racist, xenophobe and ranting idiot. Concentrate on the arguments.

Those for BREXIT are overwhelming, including the one about whether you will be better off. This appeal to greed is the REMAIN camp's principal argument, which shows just how immoral and desperate they are. There is also, however, a moral issue (and that of self-determination of course), though inevitably the money and immigration are calculated to motivate most people (what low opinions the REMAIN scum have of us!)

The MORAL ISSUE? The EU deliberately created the euro knowing it would FAIL. YES, IT'S TRUE. Their OWN economists told them it would fail. There has never been a successful monetary union without eventual fiscal and political union, and the LATTER is of course their aim. Basically, the euro was a TOTALLY political project. Like Ken Clarke and Mandelscum, they want the UK to become a mere region of a European federal state ruled from Brussels and dominated by Germany and France.

They ALSO let in Greece, which NEVER complied with the financial conditions the EU themselves set. Only Goldman-Sachs and some fudging of the numbers managed to make it look to idiots as if Greece was entitled to join the euro.

Now it has obviously FAILED. Germany has a VAST export surplus with the rest of the EU, most of which is slowly going bust - starting of course with the Med countries (and Portugal, to keep Briggs happy re the geography). Greece has just received MORE loans which it will NEVER be able to pay. Of course, the EU would sell Grandmas's remaining teeth to prevent any new crisis before the British referendum (and it's only your money, after all.) Italy is on the verge of bankruptcy; deep and long-term recession is all over Europe, France is in an official economic crisis (and civil crisis, but the govt will not admit that.) The EU is an economic shambles hamstrung by French-style red-tape and insane control-freakery: the latest example being the intention to do away with rules concerning the length of TV commercials. WHAT THE HELL HAS THAT GOT TO DO WITH THE EU?

No, staying in this lunatic asylum is unthinkable, so I hope you will do the right thing. Coates I have given up on: he loves dictatorships. WHICH REMINDS ME, Venezuela is going well, isn't it? Inflation up to 400% or something. Just another socialist basket case to blame on the USA no doubt. The problem with socialism is that A) people get into power who are obsessed with making it work and B) it never works and C) their only option then is to use force to try to maintain the pretence that it does work: hence the USSR, East Germany, China, North Korea, Cuba and so on - let's see whether Venezuelans can break the mould.

Still, let them sort it out, it's their country, after all - which is more than we can say for ours in the EU.

NO, the MORAL issue among many others is that the TEN YEARS ECONOMIC (and thus social) MISERY of Southern Europe is ENTIRELY due to the EU's Kalergi-Coudenhove obsession with creating a federal state, for which NO CITIZEN IN EUROPE HAS EVER VOTED. Indeed, when they HAVE voted against something giving Brussels more power the political elite has ignored the vote. The French voted in 2006 in a referendum to reject the "European Constitution" (a name revealing their arrogance: COUNTRIES have constitutions, not "common market" groupings) the EU elite in cahoots with the French elite rebadged it, gave it another name and passed it in parliament. Similarly with Ireland, which had to keep voting until it got the right result.

And do you remember the HOC vote on the Maastricht Treaty? Opposing MPs were physically and psychologically BULLIED into voting the right way; it was a disgusting disgrace, but the elite got the vote they wanted.

No, Michael, the 50% youth unemployment in Greece and elsewhere is the result of quasi-fascist EU arrogance and abuse of power. We don't like that in Britain, do we?

THE BOTTOM LINE TODAY?

If you vote REMAIN; the EU will take this as a green light to plough on. The euro disaster is so great that it will collapse without full fiscal integration (which you may remember was the euro's rationale in the first place). I am not sure the Germans will accept this, as it would mean huge transfers of money to the south much like they had to do with East Germany. However, democracy in Germany is so destroyed that its crapulous elite might be able to push it through, certainly labelling any protestors as "far-right" and "neo-Nazis" of course.

If they DO manage to prevent the eurocollapse, look forward to BILLIONS more UK money going south, to HARMONISATION of your taxes with France and Germany (I have lived in both for years, and trust me, you DO NOT want THAT).

There is only one way to vote, Michael ..... and I count on you to take an anti-vomit pill before voting the same way as Boris, Nigel and me ......

HAVE A GOOD DAY.

Apparently there was a letter published in the Daily Mail on the 14 June 2016 from a Diane Sanson of Northwich, Cheshire.

She claimed to have mugged a 'Remain' supporter and taken £350 from his wallet, but he didn't seem to mind. Feeling sorry for him she decided to give him half back but on condition he spent it only as she instructed and on condition that next to every item purchased he puts a picture of her saying she had paid for it. He agreed to this and they will be meeting again tomorrow to do the same again. He thought it a fantastic idea and wondered how he had been able to survive before without her.

"Fat cat my arse," said Leave.EU co-chairman Arron Banks, after Jeremy Corbyn suggested that Brexit would put the NHS in danger. "I started my business with nothing but a desk and two phones, and I've never worn a fur coat or owned a Bentley.

"I once said that I thought wealthier people should pay top-up insurance to help the NHS – the sort of policy which should be music to Jeremy's ears."
"You have to feel sorry for old Jez, really. Voted to leave in '75, voted against Maastricht, voted against Lisbon – but now the Blairites have got him supping cream from the same EU bowl as Cameron, Osborne and the crooked mega-banks who are the real fat cats in this referendum, drooling at the prospect of being able to buy up huge chunks of the health service after Brussels finalises its dodgy TTIP deal with the US.

"That's the real threat to the NHS, and I think we all appreciate that Jeremy knows it, really. Just look at what the EU and IMF have done to Greece, lashed by permanent austerity and crushed beneath a debt which can never be repaid; the suicide rate soaring and youth unemployment touching 50%. How could he possibly square all of that with his Labour values?

"Winning the Labour leadership has seen him transform from muesli-eating old Trot to champagne socialist in record time. Even his own brother thinks he'll be casting his personal vote for Brexit once he's in the privacy of the polling booth, but it's a pity he hasn't had the courage of his convictions in public.
"The MPs he's trying to keep on side will still stab him in the back the first chance they get anyway, so he's betrayed his principles for nothing."

From my research I would argue that the referendum debate within working-class communities is not about immigration, despite the rhetoric. It is about precarity and fear. As a group of east London women told me: “I’m sick of being called a racist because I worry about my own mum and my own child,” and “I don’t begrudge anyone a roof who needs it but we can’t manage either.”

Over the past 30 years there has been a sustained attack on working-class people, their identities, their work and their culture by Westminster politics and the media bubble around it. Consequently they have stopped listening to politicians and to Westminster and they are doing what every politician fears: they are using their own experiences in judging what is working for and against them.

In the last few weeks of the campaign the rhetoric has ramped up and the blame game started. If we leave the EU it will be the fault of the “stupid”, “ignorant”, and “racist” working class. Whenever working-class people have tried to talk about the effects of immigration on their lives, shouting “backward” and “racist” has become a middle-class pastime.

Corbyn must address working-class EU concerns, warns Frank Field
Read more
Working-class people in the UK can see a possibility that something might change for them if they vote to leave the EU. The women in east London and the men in the mining towns all tell me the worst thing is that things stay the same. The referendum has become a way in which they can have their say, and they are saying collectively that their lives have been better than they are today. And they are right. Shouting “racist” and “ignorant” at them louder and louder will not work – they have stopped listening.

For them, talking about immigration and being afraid of immigration is about the precarity of being working class, when people’s basic needs are no longer secure and they want change. The referendum has opened up a chasm of inequality in the UK and the monsters of a deeply divided and unfair society are crawling out. They will not easily go away no matter what the referendum result.

ME, in various blogs:

Well, if it's not lies from Cameron and Osborne, it's an exhibition of sheer, crass, insensitivity and ignorance from Geldorf and his pals.

One may - perversely - be planning to vote REMAIN, but it cannot be denied that our fishermen were royally shafted by the establishment when we joined the EU. Thousands of jobs were lost, boats laid up and the incomes of those left plummeted. The UK taxpayer PAID for Spanish and French fishing fleets to be RENEWED in order to return and fish in OUR waters. A proud and centuries-old fishing tradition up and down the coasts of England was absolutely savaged. The fishermen and their families and communities were sacrificed on the alter of EU socialism, though in this case it was done to surreal proportions. ONE single Dutch trawler now catches up to 25% of our fish; French fleets can catch over 5,000 tons of COD, but our men only 800 tons. It's all HERE, and it makes for sad reading. http://www.eutruth.info/StolenSeas.pdf

And NONE of this was the fishermen's fault.

Yet after FORTY YEARS of betrayal they organise ONE SINGLE day on the Thames to publicise their situation  and the cretinous moron Geldorf has to do his best to trash their legitimate protest.  It is still - for the moment - legal to protest peacefully in England. Despite this, the moronic spawn of an increasingly detached-from-reality-left give themselves the right to spit on an honest and legitimate protest by decent, hard-working men.

Any decent Brit will have been sickened by this idiotic parade of nastiness, so it probably won us a lot of votes. And to be fair, it is reported that several people actually ON that boat have twittered that they got off it as soon as possible in disgust, such a moronic performance not being what they had signed up to.

As for the fishing, the wrong done all those years ago was SO VAST that THIS ALONE is reason for leaving the hideous EU, which by God's grace we will vote to do in a week's time.

Farage, of course, is routinely slagged off by the same kind of unicellular-brained Neanderthals as on that boat. An objective observer, however, would point out that a decent Englishman fighting for decades to regain our sovereignty was supporting a group of REAL working men whom the traditional left of "Olde Labour" - a group that becomes ever more attractive the more one looks at the grotesque new version  - once would have stood up for.

Fishermen brave the elements to feed us. All the little fishing ports up and down the coast have memorials to men lost at sea. People in those communities must be sickened by what happened today.

Geldorf joins a long list of cretins supporting REMAIN for some weird reason: Cameron, Osborne, Diane Abbott, Andy Burnham, the Kinnock dynasty, the Miliband dynasty, Nick Clegg (mercifully quiet on the hustings), Blair, Brown and Mandelscum, Obama, Hollande, Merkel, Juncker, Schulz and of course Eddie Izzard - not forgetting John Major.

Dave JOBSON: Please read: This is going to get embarrassing for the remain campaign. So buckle up. Now I'm not an economist, but I can pick apart research papers, and If I can pick apart their claims, anyone can. Over the past month I’ve really taken interest in the research articles surrounding The Stronger In Europe campaigns, especially since this could influence my potential career in a European country as a Physiotherapist in the ESA. Unfortunately, there are just too many plot holes in the Remain Campaigns figures. I will now attempt to take apart the political agenda put forward by the Remain campaigns short video titled “How would leaving Europe affect you and your family?” just to show how ludicrous its claims are. Please share this so as many people can see as possible, and please feel free to criticize my own conclusions, and I invite you to challenge me on points made.

"9 out of 10 economists say brexit would damage the economy" : This study was drawn from a sample of 639 economists working in the GES. Unfortunately, what they failed to tell you is that there are actually 1400 economists working in the GES, meaning that 761 weren't accounted for. That's excluding other organisations and institutes.

To give you a sense of how much misrepresentation this statistic implies, imagine one borough being hand-picked by the government, which mainly supported labour, to vote in a government every year. It means that the rest of the UK population would have no say at all, and only labour votes would ever be accounted for. The same scenario applies for the economist statistics put forward. This statistic has been manipulated in favour of the Remain campaign, and fails to acknowledge the larger consensus of the entire economist population, particularly from the Society of Business Economists and 3rd party organisations such as Universities. There are an unprecedented amount of economists supporting the Brexit campaign, including Professor Patrick Minford who in one debate had to educate an entire panel of supposed experts, on the effects of trade if we remained or left the EU.
"Jobs Lost & Fewer Opportunities" – Source CBI

This updated analysis came from two separate papers. One from the Centre of Economics and Business Research and British Influence published in 2000, and one from South Bank University published in 2000. Since both papers suggest a similar set of figures, I will use the CBI paper as the example. According to Nigel Pain et al. (2000) it is estimated that 4.2 million jobs were supported by exports by UK firms to the EU – 3.1 Million supported directly by exports and 1.1 million indirectly through the spending this generated.

Of course though, this headline gives a disingenuous and mistaken interpretation, and is a classic example of the Remain campaign bending the figures in their favour for use in their scare mongering tactics. Yes, these figures are correct, but they actually represent the effect of imports and exports with the EEA, the World Trade Organisation, and businesses in other EU countries, not trade with a political union such as the EU. (Butcher, B. and Shaw, P. 2013) You are being deceived and lied to.

I don’t wish to sound biased towards the leave campaign, so I will also clear up a myth circulating which supports the Brexit campaign. This myth states that “we are not voting to leave the EEC, we are voting to leave the European Union, therefore trade is unaffected.” Unfortunately, this isn’t true as the EEC institutions were absorbed into the EU in 2009. But yet again, this is irrelevant. The only jobs lost will be those directly attached to the EU itself, and jobs concerned with imports and exports, and any other category for that matter will not be lost.

This begs the question, if we were to leave why on earth would the EU stop trading with us anyway? Please bear in mind that in 2014 UK exports totalled to $503 billion, whereas imports totalled to $802 Billion. Who is the UK’s biggest import partners? Germany, China, Netherlands, USA, France, Belgium, and Italy. And now you know why the USA is desperate for the UK to remain as part of the bi-lateral trade agreement, and why the exports of other EU countries would plummet if we decided to stop trading with them. In short, they need us more than we need them.

“Higher Food Prices in our Shops” – NFU.

I have the fortune of belonging to a heritage mostly comprised of people who have worked in agriculture, with my father as an Agronomist. Quite frankly, we are baffled at why the Remain campaign have decided to use this quote from the NFU. In a recent paper published by Dr. Jonathon Gillham, it talks about whether GDP would overall increase or decrease by 2030 if we leave the EU. He concludes that it would fall. However, after doing some digging I found that he actually works as a macroeconomist for the treasury. And who runs the treasury? George Osborne. Who told us that leaving the EU would cause profound economic shock? George Osborne. How can we trust Osborne now after finding out that the papers he’s quoting date from the year 2000, and that these figures are not associated with imports and exports between the EU and UK? (And this is coming from a conservative supporter).

Anyway, since this is a quote from the NFU we’ll assume they’re talking about agriculture. For a start, if we leave the EU levels of government support to British farming would be unaffected, and might actually rise as the UK contributes more to the CAP than it receives back. On top of this, Government support would be targeted at issues affecting British, not European, farmers. That’s all irrelevant though, as I’m sure all you farmers out there are only interested in the farm subsidies we receive from the EU. As we all know, a subsidy is a set amount of money per land used to incentivize farming, which will cease when Britain leaves the European Union and this will make the British economy suffer. Which is right? Isn’t it…? Or so we were told, and unsurprisingly it’s the opposite. The British economy will suffer when you only acknowledge the idea Britain will be “losing” money. When you look at all the facts carefully the current farm subsidies do not outweigh the detriment being caused by the European Union. In fact, according to Saha, David; von Weizsäcker, Jakob (2009 from Brussels itself), in 2009 alone the agreed eu-economic wide stimulus was 200 billion. But they didn’t state who the largest contributors were. Maybe it’s because the UK is one of the largest contributors? This figure was just for 2009 alone, so imagine how much money the UK has been wasting on bailing out the EU since the start of the last decade!

Farm subsidies are not helping British farmers because the British receive a tiny portion. Looking at the big picture Britain receives a measly 7% of all EU farming subsidies. And whilst we're on the topic of prices increasing on the shelves, this would be irrelevant anyway. In 2015 the Bank of England warned that mass migration was driving down the wages being offered to British jobseekers. Economists found that increases in immigration have reduced the average wage for UK citizens. David Davis, the former shadow home secretary, urged the Prime Minister to tell the “truth” on migration by releasing new statistics.

In April this year ministers were accused of hiding the full scale of migration after officials suggested that 257,000 EU nationals came to Britain last year. Over the same period, 630,000 EU citizens registered for a national insurance number, which would entitle them to work or claim benefits in Britain. Regardless of whether the figures are true or not, it is undeniable that with more control over our borders, immigration would decrease drastically, the average wage would rise, and therefore the price of goods increasing on the shelves would be totally irrelevant.

POSTED BY AN UNKNOWN FACEBOOK BLOGGER

n.b. "funded by EU grant" means in REALSPEAK: "YOU paid for this company to relocate from YOUR country to ANOTHER country."

• Cadbury moved factory to Poland 2011 with EU grant.
  
  
• Ford Transit moved to Turkey 2013 with EU grant.
  
  
• Jaguar Land Rover has recently agreed to build a new plant in Slovakia with EU grant, owned by Tata, the same company who have trashed our steel works and emptied the workers' pension funds.
  
  
• Peugeot closed its Ryton (was Rootes Group) plant and moved production to Slovakia with EU grant.
  British Army's new Ajax fighting vehicles to be built in SPAIN using SWEDISH steel at the request of the EU to support jobs in Spain with EU grant, rather than Wales.
  
  
• Dyson gone to Malaysia, with an EU loan.
  
  
• Crown Closures, Bournemouth (Was METAL BOX), gone to Poland with EU grant, once employed 1,200.
  
  
• M&S manufacturing gone to far east with EU loan.
  
  
• Hornby models gone. In fact all toys and models now gone from UK along with the patents all with with EU grants.
  
  
• Gillette gone to eastern Europe with EU grant.
  
  
• Texas Instruments Greenock gone to Germany with EU grant.
  
  
• Indesit at Bodelwyddan Wales gone with EU grant.
  
  
• Sekisui Alveo said production at its Merthyr Tydfil Industrial Park foam plant will relocate production to Roermond in the Netherlands, with EU funding.
  
  
• Hoover Merthyr factory moved out of UK to Czech Republic and the Far East by Italian company Candy with EU backing.
  
  
• ICI integration into Holland’s AkzoNobel with EU bank loan and within days of the merger, several factories in the UK, were closed, eliminating 3,500 jobs.
  
  
• Boots sold to Italians Stefano Pessina who have based their HQ in Switzerland to avoid tax to the tune of £80 million a year, using an EU loan for the purchase.
  
  
• JDS Uniphase run by two Dutch men, bought up companies in the UK with £20 million in EU 'regeneration' grants, created a pollution nightmare and just closed it all down leaving 1,200 out of work and an environmental clean-up paid for by the UK tax-payer. They also raided the pension fund and drained it dry.
  
  
• UK airports are owned by a Spanish company.
  
  
• Scottish Power is owned by a Spanish company.
  
  
• Most London buses are run by Spanish and German companies.
  
  
• The Hinkley Point C nuclear power station to be built by French company EDF, part owned by the French government, using cheap Chinese steel that has catastrophically failed in other nuclear installations. Now EDF say the costs will be double or more and it will be very late even if it does come online.
  
  
• Swindon was once our producer of rail locomotives and rolling stock. Not any more, it's Bombardier in Derby and due to their losses in the aviation market, that could see the end of the British railways manufacturing altogether even though Bombardier had EU grants to keep Derby going which they diverted to their loss-making aviation side in Canada.
  
  
• 39% of British invention patents have been passed to foreign companies, many of them in the EU.
  
  
• The Mini cars that Cameron stood in front of as an example of British engineering, are built by BMW mostly in Holland and Austria. His campaign bus was made in Germany even though we have Plaxton, Optare, Bluebird, Dennis etc., in the UK. The bicycle for the Greens was made in the far east, not by Raleigh UK but then they are probably going to move to the Netherlands too as they have said recently.
  
  
• Anyone who thinks the EU is good for British industry or any other business simply hasn't paid attention to what has been systematically asset-stripped from the UK. Name me one major technology company still running in the UK, I used to contract out to many, then the work just dried up as they were sold off to companies from France, Germany, Holland, Belgium, etc., and now we don't even teach electronic technology for technicians any more, due to EU regulations.
  
  
• I haven't detailed our non-existent fishing industry the EU paid to destroy, nor the farmers being paid NOT to produce food they could sell for more than they get paid to do nothing; don't even go there.
  
  
• I haven't mentioned what it costs us to be asset-stripped like this, nor have I mentioned immigration, nor the risk to our security if control of our armed forces is passed to Brussels or Germany.
  
  
• Find something that's gone the other way, I've looked and I just can't. If you think the EU is a good idea,
  1/ You haven't read the party manifesto of The European Peoples' Party.
  2/ You haven't had to deal with EU petty bureaucracy tearing your business down.
  3/ You don't care.

An academic working as an adviser for the Treasury has been suspended from his Whitehall role after co-authoring a book criticising the EU.

He wrote From Brussels With Love, an analysis of the EU's origins, with Maastricht rebel and Tory Eurosceptic MP Sir Bill Cash, chairman of the European Scrutiny Committee. Sir Bill said the Treasury's decision was an 'outrageous act of bullying' and an 'attack on free speech'.

Emma Pullen is clear why she wants to leave the European Union. Her hovercraft manufacturing business on Sandwich Industrial Estate in Kent has fallen foul of a number of laws from Brussels which has made her firm less competitive.

It is limited by the EU’s Recreational Craft Directive, which excludes the hovercraft it makes from gaining CE safety marks
We are on the back foot compared to any other recreational vehicle. -- “If you are selling a jetski to Europe, a buyer will just look for the CE mark and know it is safe we comply to the same standards but we can’t use it, even though it is the first thing authorities ask for, Trying to get that changed is a massive issue. It has severely restricted our business in the EU.”

Those who want to remain in the EU are suffering from a delusion know as Stockholm syndrome, or capture-bonding. It is a psychological phenomenon described in 1973 in which hostages express empathy and sympathy and have positive feelings toward their captors, sometimes to the point of defending and identifying with the captors. These feelings are generally considered irrational in light of the danger or risk endured by the victims, who essentially mistake a lack of abuse from their captors for an act of kindness.

Stockholm syndrome can be seen as a form of traumatic bonding, which does not necessarily require a hostage scenario, but which describes "strong emotional ties that develop between two persons where one person intermittently harasses, beats, threatens, abuses, or intimidates the other." One commonly used hypothesis to explain the effect of Stockholm syndrome is based on Freudian theory. It suggests that the bonding is the individual's response to trauma in becoming a victim. Identifying with the aggressor is one way that the ego defends itself. When a victim believes the same values as the aggressor, they cease to be perceived as a threat.

Please share with everyone to help the victims of Stockholm Syndrome break free from their delusion.

3rd PARTY BLOG COMMENT: The City of London is the centre of the financial and capital markets. But is under siege from the EU, and its continuing success is under dire threat. Why? Because the EU repeatedly launches assaults upon the Anglo-Saxon banking system – which is much despised and envied by those on the continent. The modus operandi: over regulation. The desired result: the relocation of the City’s institutions to Frankfurt and Paris, no doubt in order to control and manipulate them in the way that only Brussels can.

Here are a few things about the EU and our economy. You can decide if they were good or bad but I know where my vote is going: for freedom.

• Jaguar Land Rover stops making its Defender in the UK because of EU laws on fuel emissions. It is now set to be built abroad outside the EU.
  
  
• In 2007 the Peugeot factory in Ryton, Coventry closed down (2,300 job losses) and moved to Slovakia with the help of £78m EU funding.
  
  
• Britain's remaining ferry service to Scandinavia (DFDS Harwich to Esbjerg) ended in 2014 after 140 years service because of an EU Directive.
  
  
• '3000 police cars foreign made'. Police say they are powerless to offer contracts to British car factories because of EU procurement rules.
  
  
• Before the UK entered the EEC/EU, unemployment stood at 2.6%. It is now 5.6% (1.85 million - May, 2015).
  
  
• Norway, Iceland and Switzerland are thriving because they are not encumbered by Euro bailout costs and extortionate EU membership fees.
  
  
• There were 25 EU Free Trade Agreements in force in 2012 while the Swiss (non-EU) had independently negotiated 26.
  
  
• The EU's Landfill Directive has been responsible for some councils ending their weekly bin collections.
  
  
• EU specified light bulbs cost 500% more than filament bulbs. Some people complain that the EU specified light bulbs produce a lesser quality of light and cfl's contain mercury, a poisonous neurotoxin and phosphors. Health issues affecting those that suffer from light sensitivity.
  
  
• It's been suggested that VAT on domestic fuels should be cut from 5% to zero. But 5% is the minimum allowed under EU law.
  
  
• Less than 10% of Britain's GDP represents trade with the EU yet Brussels regulations afflict 100% of the UK economy.
  
  
• Britain will pay £100 million a year more to the European budget over the next five years. (Telegraph: 03/12/2014)
  
  
• Article 42 3. gives the EU the power to begin the process of standardising the military forces of the member states via the EDA.
  
  
• Britain receives just 49p of every £1 paid to the European Union. (Sunday Express & Business for Britain, 12/07/2015)
  
  
• TTIP will undermine data privacy by making it easier for companies to gain access to individuals’ personal details for commercial purposes.
  
  
• EU Commission will block public access to all documents related to TTIP negotiations for 30 years. (EU/US negotiator Ignacio Garcia Bercero)
  
  
• TTIP will downgrade food safety rules (including restrictions on GMOs), regulations on the use of toxic chemicals and data protection laws.
  
  
• TTIP will allow corporations to sue the UK under the Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) clause.
  
  
• European crime gangs are operating here with impunity due to EU open borders. Gov't estimates there are 13k trafficking victims in the UK.
  
  
• The UK may withdraw from the obligations of any (EU) treaty under Articles 56,65,66,67 of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.
  
  
• The EU isn't in the top five issues people are most concerned about. But those five issues are affected by the EU - like immigration.
  
  
• HoC library's 13% UK laws made in Brussels figure doesn't include EU reg's which are transposed into law without passing through parliament.
  
  
• The House of Commons library say 13.3% of UK laws now come from Brussels. European Commissioner Viviane Reding says it's 70%.
  
  
• Our future does not depend on our membership of the European Union, it rests on our abilities to progress in the world outside of it.
  
  
• Net EU contributions together with the adverse impact on business here of EU regulations will cost the UK more than £20billion in 2015.
  
  
• There's no economic benefit in the UK remaining in the EU. EU regulations cost our businesses alone over £9.4bn, according to the BIS.
  
  
• There was NO 'free movement' for Brits to the EU (EEC) before we joined in '73. Yet we lived, studied, worked, holidayed and retired there.
  
  
• The EU is NOT "Europe". It's 56% of Europe's countries, 68% of the continent's population and just 43% of its land mass.
  
  
• UK membership of EU: "Perhaps surprisingly, it's virtually impossible to find hard proof of any net benefit" — Carsten Volkery, Der Spiegel
  
  
• UK has LOWER GDP ppp per head than: Australia - Canada - HK - Iceland - Norway - Singapore - Switzerland - Taiwan - USA
  Countries THRIVE outside the EU!
  
  
• Britain’s future outside is bright, while the ‎EU‬ is anti-democratic, anti-growth, and holding Britain back | via E21 http://t.co/fuFrsSuDHs
  
  
• EU commits €267.6m for Denmark, €129.6m Estonia, €284.6m Germany, €172.9m for Sweden to boost fisheries & aquaculture. Nothing for the UK.
  
  
• Top importers into the EU, by proportion of total EU imports: None have Free Trade Agreements with the EU! 18% China - 12% USA - 11% Russia
  
  
• 'Britain had regular manufacturing & service trade surpluses with the rest of W Europe before joining the EEC (EU) in 1973' — Lewis Abbott
  
  
• Well over a third of EU citizens reaching the UK in the year to March 2015 (39%) had no job arranged prior to their arrival here. ONS
  
  
• In the past four quarters the EU exported £84.935bn more goods to the UK than we did to it. The EU cannot afford to stop trading with us!
  
  
• The 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 7th, 9th, 10th, 11th, 12th and 13th biggest economies can survive and prosper outside the EU. So can the 5th: the UK.
  
  
• Switzerland, Canada, South Africa, Chile, Mexico and South Korea have free trade agreements with the EU. So would the UK when we leave it.
  
  
• UK Net Contributions to the EU budget:
  
  

£11.3bn 2015 (OBR estimate)
£11.0bn 2014
£ 8.6bn 2013
£ 8.5bn 2012
£ 8.1bn 2011
£ 7.4bn 2010

AND: Elected MEPs cannot initiate legislation, propose legislation or even repeal legislation. All that is done by the unelected EU Commission.

Armed Forces Minister Ms Mordaunt, MP: said: "One reason why I decided to Leave is because I think it’s the only route open to us to get both the better deal that we need to thrive – but also to try and wake up the EU from what it’s currently sleepwalking into, which is a disaster.

"The suffering that it is putting on certain member states because it can't get its act together over the euro, that forced harmonisation, is horrific, and is just the sort of thing that is going to lead to those countries not thriving, but failing.

"Take a look at what’s happening on the continent now. The tremendous potential for civil unrest. The tremendous ill feeling built up in Spain, Portugal, Italy, Greece, because of the forced harmonisation in the eurozone, the tremendous austerity."

Project Fear: More LIES from the Remain Campaign

DAVID Miliband claimed British workers could be stripped of four weeks’ annual holiday under Brexit.....Attempting to rally Labour voters into backing remain, the ex-foreign secretary said a month’s annual leave “exists for every single employee as a result of being in the EU” and is “at risk” on June 23.

But Leave campaigners pointed out workers are entitled to five weeks and three days off under British law – and argued it had nothing to do with Brussels The UK first legislated for paid holiday in 1938 and “gold-plated” EU rules in 2007 to make them more generous

Reply to a blogger:

Why this patronising contempt for Farage?

• He has been CONSISTENT about the EU for decades.
  
• He has been RIGHT about the EU for decades.
  
• He has fought an often lonely and sneered at fight against the evil of Brussels for decades. (Yes, it IS evil.)
  
• He only wants our country to be independent, to govern ourselves, like multiple other countries. He does not want to be in a federal state dominated by Germany with France as its poodle and drowning in French-style bureaucracy. Is that what YOU want?
  
  For the life of me I cannot see why this basic and honorable principle should be treated with such contempt by people like you. Why the contempt for someone who simply wants his country to remain independent? What is it you don't like about him? That he likes a decent pint and isn't a slimy, glib, lying Westminster spin-merchant?
  
  Describing Farage as "an ignorant moron" says a lot more about you than about him.