MY ASSESSMENT of this crisis

Russia has to get out of Ukraine - END OF. The rest is BS.

Let's see:

Peaceful Cornwall which is no danger to anyone is illegally invaded and occupied along with Devon. Tens of thousands of the Brits living there are killed, maimed, tortured, raped and many children kidnapped and taken to be "DECORNWALLISED". PLUS of course a vast area is devastated, including shopping-malls, residential areas and deliberately-targeted medical facilities. St Michael's Mount is a smoking ruin - and St Ives is just a pile of rubble.

But we want "peace" - so we make a deal whereby the invader keeps the territory occupied, in which of course tens of thousands of Brits will live under permanent occupation - and a new border established splitting our country permanently in two.

Companies of ANOTHER foreign country profit massively from this as they exploit the minerals in the territory that the invader did not manage to occupy. In return they hope this will deter the invader from enlarging the area under their control.

BRILLIANT! Baldrick could not have come up with a more cunning plan ....

HOWEVER, ........

1) APPEASEMENT NEVER WORKS. HAD Ukraine been admitted into NATO prior to 2014 then NONE OF THS WOULD HAVE HAPPENED. The Russians would not have DARED invade - and NO, there was NEVER any danger of a nuclear war, which Putin's generals would ONLY have let him start had Russia ITSELF been threatened - which was NEVER the case.

Had the lessons of 1936 been learned then HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF LIVES would not have been lost and/or ruined. (SEE HERE: http://www.vervinomni.net/count/UKRAINE/1.htm)

2) Russia is failing in this invasion: its military in a shambles and economy collapsing. YES, it might still prevail through sheer force of numbers and help from the other forces of EVIL on the planet: China, NK & Iran - allied to the fact that its leadership does not give a damn how many young Russians and Ukrainians die - BUT a properly-committed Western campaign would rapidly drive them back to their borders.

You can dress it up and rationalize it as much as you like but the truth is that if Russia retains any Ukrainian territory then naked fascist lunacy has prevailed because the West is more interested in money than morality. CHINA WILL GET THE MESSAGE, so get ready for the catastrophic invasion of Taiwan.

PS Russia would shut down Europe's energy supplies? WE HAVE MANAGED DO FAR and would continue to do so. Russia, however, would NOT manage. Its economy is already in serious trouble and without income from energy would collapse. RUSSIA COULD NOT PREVAIL against a united FREE WORLD. It WILL prevail against a fragmented and morally-corrupt one.


A REMINDER: RUSSIA INVADED A PEACEFUL SOVEREIGN COUNTRY THAT POSED NO CONCEIVABLE DANGER TO RUSSIA AND HAS IN DOING SO DESTROYED HUGE AREAS AND INFRASTRUCTURE INCLUDING DELIBERATELY-TARGETED HOSPITALS, SHOPPING MALLS AND RESIDENTIAL AREAS - WITH HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF INNOCENT PEOPLE'S LIVES ENDED OR RUINED.

I don't care HOW corrupt Ukraine is: UNTOLD THOUSANDS OF UTTERLY INNOCENT PEOPLE HAVE BEEN KILLED, MAIMED FOR LIFE, RAPED, TORTURED AND/OR in the case of children kidnapped to be "Russified" in Russia. PUTIN IS INDEED HITLERIAN - willing to kill HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of innocent people including his own young men who did not ask to be killed in this lunacy - and WHY, because he thinks Ukraine "belongs to Russia" and HE like Peter the Great is going to be a hero.

Ukraine NEVER belonged to Russia. THEY ARE A DIFFERENT PEOPLE. But Putin does not think that Ukrainians should exist. IF HE WINS there is a real danger of genocide - which the Russians already tried in the last century. He complains about Ukraine "Moving forces to the border"? SERIOUSLY? UKRAINE is a SOVEREIGN COUNTRY and can move forces where the HELL it likes. IT WAS NO CONCEIVABLE DANGER TO RUSSIA. It gave up its nuclear weapons FGS. NATO is no danger to Russia either - quite the reverse. Putin has threatened nuclear war several times, but it is all BS. His generals would never let him use nukes unless Russia ITSELF was in dir threat - which has NEVER been the case. NOTHING he says has ANY credence. HE IS INSANE. HE IS ONE MILLION PER CENT RESPONSIBLE for this and apologists for Russia are demented.

THIS IS A STRUGGLE FOR THE FUTURE OF MANKIND, not just Ukraine. Will it be peaceful and democratic or ruled by dictatorship, tyranny and enslavement?

APPEASEMENT DOES NOT WORK. DETERRENT DOES. NATO in Ukraine in force would end this. Russia is collapsing economically. Even with its vast resources IT HAS NOT BEEN ABLE TO DEFEAT much smaller Ukraine. We need to do MORE, not LESS. Starmer is hideously WRONG about everything but he is NOT WRONG ABOUT UKRAINE. If Putin wins then China will be emboldened to attack Taiwan - ANOTHER sovereign country that poses no danger and to which CHINA HAS NO CLAIM WHATSOEVER.

FREEDOM has a price and if that price is not paid we are slaves. HITLER had no beef with us in 1939: we did not NEED to declare war when he invaded Poland, but IT WAS THE RIGHT THING TO DO.


I wouldn't normally copy an entire press article, but I don't imagine the DT would mind in this exceptional case. This is a matter of global urgency about which the maximum number of people need to be fully informed of the stupfying inhumanity of the Russian army and regime.

Meanwhile, people keep dying in Ukraine. Russian aggression delivers mass death by a ghastly mixture of modern technology, chiefly drones (now nearly 50 per cent of Ukrainian deaths in battle), and Great War-style bombardments.

During his Oval Office set-up of President Zelensky last Friday, Donald Trump said that men were dying because of “a lot of bullets”. Actually, bullets achieve only two per cent of the deaths.

In the past three years, the number of Ukrainians killed probably matches the 58,000 Americans who died over 20 years in Vietnam. There may be four times as many dead Russians.

The only cure is a just peace, but deaths can be reduced now – a precious achievement, militarily and morally. Last week, after following the politics in Kyiv, I travelled east, to the Zaporizhzhia oblast, to see lives being saved at the front.

Time is key, loss of blood being the biggest single cause of avoidable death. In Afghanistan and Iraq, the British defined the “Golden Hour” in which a wounded man could be helicoptered out. No such luxury exists in Ukraine. Any helicopter entering the zone would be destroyed.

Far from sparing medical operations, the Russians target them. Wounded lying on the battlefield are observed by Russian drones and attacked when they and their rescuers emerge from hiding. Sometimes they are trapped in freezing foxholes for days, long enough for the tourniquets designed to save them to induce organ failure and death.

The Russians constantly bomb stabilisation points – “role one” in the sequence of medical treatment – and military hospitals. I met the charismatic Lt-Col Roman Kuziv, the officer commanding medical services in the east (scene of most of the fighting for 500,000 soldiers), aged only 36 but a general by acting rank. Though Ukrainian, he trained as a doctor in Catalonia, where his wife and two young daughters live. He has been at the front for three years this month.

We drove to one of his 150 stabilisation points, seven miles from the front. Suddenly our armoured vehicle descended a steep incline, passed through strips of camouflage and parked 20 feet below ground. “When we were on the surface,” said Col Kuziv, “The Russians bombed us 16 times, killing one, injuring nine. So I dug this.”

We entered a hall supported by wooden pillars, a log cabin. Off it lay several rooms, each protected by corrugated iron, containing one well-equipped hospital bed.

Patients are divided into “red” (or “hard-wounded”), “yellow” and “green” (minor injuries). Ten per cent of the wounded are red. Once stabilised, they are transported to surgery, a journey that can take four hours. Such is the efficiency that the facility can manage, at maximum, 200 patients a day.

That particular day, the local front was quiet, so we drove on to another stabilisation point, a makeshift mini-hospital in what resembled large tents within a semi-derelict building. Though overground, it was concealed. No ambulance dares linger. An emergency bunker was being dug.

Here I witnessed what I had come to see – the work of my hosts MOAS (moas.eu), a charity, international and British-registered, which began quite differently. Its initials stand for migrant offshore aid station. It was set up to help refugees in the Mediterranean.

Several years ago, however, its charismatic founder-leader, Christopher Catrambone, decided there were more lives to be saved in Ukraine. MOAS became the main casualty evacuators (“casevac”) for the Ukrainian army, conveying, by this month, 67,648 casualties, overwhelmingly red patients. None has died during their evacuations.

The key to success is that MOAS’s people are trained doctors and paramedics. Col Kuziv trusts them to transport the patients, continuing to stabilise them as they go.

I saw it happen. At the stabilisation point, a “hard-wounded” 50-year-old soldier was being treated by six army medical staff for more than an hour. He had shrapnel in both legs, one hand, his abdomen, spleen, thorax and face. He looked a bloody mess. Once stabilised, he was gently trussed up for the journey, wrapped in foil against hypothermia (the outside temperature was sub-zero) and handed over to the MOAS ambulance and staff.

I travelled beside the wounded, oxygenated, unconscious man on the half-hour journey to the hospital which could operate. Attending to him throughout were a paramedic and Dr Inna, a tiny young anaesthetist, both from MOAS. As we bumped along the war-damaged roads, they found their way through a seemingly impossible tangle of wires to keep him stable.

The patient must be too ill to live, I thought, but Dr Inna, as she transferred him, said, with perfect confidence, that he would be all right.

MOAS’s expanding operations cost a lot and money has not kept up. The British government, though supportive, has not cut the bureaucratic Gordian knot about which department should pay. There is talk of needing a “demand signal” from Ukraine, yet Col Kuziv, the man who knows the most, has written to our Government to plead for MOAS.

The next day, I met Alina, a resolute 29-year-old woman who commands a MOAS team of 20 quartered every night underground to escape bombardment.

She longs to go home to the safer western Ukraine and start a family. With a volley of oaths, she tells me how she hates this war. But she adds, “I’m here because I need to be here.” She is a volunteer, but her commitment is such that she feels she has no choice. I wish I could put her in front of President Trump. He might understand better if he met more Ukrainians.


The bells are tolling for US.

For Whom The Bell Tolls - John Donne

No man is an island,
Entire of itself.
Each is a piece of the continent,
A part of the main.
If a clod be washed away by the sea,
Europe is the less.
As well as if a promontory were.
As well as if a manner of thine own
Or of thine friend’s were.
Each man’s death diminishes me,
For I am involved in mankind.
Therefore, send not to know
For whom the bell tolls,
It tolls for thee.


Putin has utterly brutalised Russia, whose army is behaving like depraved sub-humans.